Thursday, March 4, 2010

Implicate Astrology

"As long as you still experience the stars as something "above you", you lack the eye of knowledge."

- Friedrich Nietzsche

Have you ever looked up at the stars, so impossibly distant and mysterious, and wondered what it all has to do with you? If anything? If you're of a scientific or, at any rate, materialist bent - and I certainly have been, off and on, for a good fraction of my life, so: no one's judging - then outside of the idea that we're all ultimately made from star-dust (and that connection, tenuous as it is, is only to long-dead stars, gone supernovae billions of years before the Earth formed, let alone you) your answer will no doubt be, "Not a whole hell of a lot." The stars are a long way away, after all: so far that these inconceivably huge, blazing cosmic furnaces are reduced to infinitesimal pinpricks of light. Their gravitational force is far too weak to affect us; their magnetic fields, likewise. Aside from sharing our universe with us, and decorating our night skies, the stars have nothing to do with us.

That's the consensus, and until recently, I would have agreed with it without reservation. The alternative, the notion that there might be some connection between the stars and us, strikes the modern mind as a curious superstition; that so many persist in a belief in a astrology strikes the scientifically educated as one of those regrettable and incomprehensible atavisms ... much like the belief in God, spirits, angels, chakras, what have you. There is, they say, no scientific support for such notions; and so, in rationalist circles, it is impermissible to broach the subject unless one's intent is to make fun of it.

And yet ... here's the thing. When you take a closer look at science, at the real bleeding edge of it, the truly scientific mind - open and unclouded by dogma - starts to see something quite different.

Since the 1950s physics has been grappling with quantum non-locality, the so-called Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, which Einstein referred to as 'spooky action at a distance'. Amusingly, EPR began as an effort to discredit quantum mechanics: Einstein and his collaborators had hoped to point out a reductio-ad-absurdum in quantum theory, by showing that the equations implied that two particles (electrons, say, or photons), once 'entangled' or connected by means of their wavefunctions, would mutually affect one another over arbitrary distances: a measurement of one would instantly determine the state of the other, seemingly violating the speed-of-light limit on the transfer of information.

A more careful analysis later revealed that general relativity and its iron-clad speed of light remained safe: no information could be transmitted through this mechanism. Nevertheless quantum non-locality itself remained very much a fact, as has been verified time and again in the laboratory. This has led some to speculate that, given that all particles must have been co-located at the time of the Big Bang, all particles may in fact be mutually entangled with one another, sharing a sort of 'universal wave function'.

There are now many variations on this idea. David Bohm, a physicist who ran so close to the bleeding edge he went right off it (in the view of many of his colleagues) postulated what he called the 'implicate order': that the universe might in fact be analagous to a hologram, with each element within it in a sense containing the whole. This idea has been expanded on by others, with some physicists even suggesting that the universe of space and time that we (seem to) inhabit isn't just like a hologram, it is a hologram, projected inwards from the boundaries of the cosmos: just as a holographic image is a 3-dimensional illusion encoded into every segment of a 2-dimensional photographic plate, so the universe is a 4-dimensional illusion encoded into a a 3-dimensional surface. Interestingly, there are observational consequences to this idea: a year ago, those predictions were borne out at a gravitational wave observatory in Germany. If this discovery turns out to be genuine - and I expect it will - those involved will most certainly win the Nobel Prize, while the rest of us (and science especially) will have to turn our conception of reality inside out.

Of course, science moves very slowly: it will likely take years for the results of this experiment to be verified, and years more for it to be accepted. As a scientist I would have it no other way; as a mystic, I could care less.

Now, in my day-job - when I'm not moonlighting here at Moon Food - I am a scientist, or at least a scientist-in-training. My field is astrophysics, stellar astronomy in particular; in fact at this very moment I am sitting in the control room of a hulking beast of a telescope, a scientific instrument the size of a bus with a giant mirror polished to a precision that staggers the mind, an impressive and expensive piece of engineering meant for measuring the spectra of giant stars. As an astrophysicist I find it endlessly puzzling that although we have known of quantum non-locality for over half a century, our discipline has failed entirely to assimilate this idea. But then, to truly tease out the implications of the implicate order would obligate them to admit that, these past several hundred years, they might have been very wrong indeed and ... how embarrassing would that be?

Several months ago, at the beginning of my astrophysical career, I came across a very interesting and quite scholarly volume: Cosmos and Psyche, by Richard Tarnas of the Integral Institute. Anyone who's ever had their sense of reality, mind, and self exploded by Ken Wilbur will recognize the Integral Institute; for me, that affiliation alone was enough for me to give Tarnas' book a second look. In it, he lays out the reasoning and methodology behind astrology in a very logical fashion, examining the last several hundred years of history through the lens of the transpersonal planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto (while touching also on Jupiter and Saturn, the more slow-moving - and thus more easily analyzed - of the personal planets.)

It was a fascinating and compelling read, but the scientist in me felt the need to put the theory to the test. "If there's anything to this," I said, "Then I will have Neptune in prominent aspect." Tarnas compared Neptune to Orpheus: it is the planet of dreamers and poets, of high ideals and head-in-the-clouds illusions, of mystical dissolution of the ego in the sea of consciousness and dissipation of the spirit at the bottom of a bottle of spirits. All of these have been powerful forces in my life; ergo, I reasoned, Neptune should be somewhere in my chart.

And so I asked my bemused mother the time of my birth, calculated my natal chart and, lo and behold, there was Neptune: in almost perfect conjunction with the Sun (go to the bottom of this page, where my chart is on display for all to see, and you can verify this for yourself.) The hair practically stood up on the back of my neck.

I was convinced.

Not that I'd ever admit that to my colleagues, of course. They'd think I'd lost it! And maybe I have but ... over the past several months and especially with the help of the fantastic text Astrologik by Antero Alli I've given the subject a deeper study, at the expense (I freely admit) of my formal studies and I have yet to be disappointed. Analyzing not just my own natal chart, but those of friends and family members, has consistently revealed an endless series of correspondences between the messages written in the sky at the time of birth and the personalities I know them (and myself) to have.

As a postscript, not so long ago I was adding some of the asteroids to my natal chart, and discovered that Eros - goddess of eroticism - was also in perfect conjunct with Neptune and the Sun. This made sense: I've always been a very good lover, practically by instinct (for no other reason than that selfish loving strikes me as not just rude but dull). Mere days after discovering this, on a whim I googled 'quantum astrology' for the very first time, wondering if others had made the same connections between Bohm, the implicate order, and astrology, and was led directly to the website of the fascinating and beautiful Kim Falconer: martial artist, mystic, fantasy author, and astrologer. Her speciality? None other than Eros.

I don't know where this new doorway into synchronicity will ultimately lead. To enlightenment? To madness? One thing is for sure, however: my conception of the world has been radically expanded, yet again, and if scientists scoff?

A fig for their narrow ideology. This is fun!

16 comments:

Lukiftian said...

I've downloaded your chart... I'll take a look at it.

Off the top--the Moon is in a G-zone, the sign of an artist or a writer, not a scientist. You get some jollies from astronomy but I doubt the science of it is your real calling. This might annoy some of your colleagues.
The Sun-Neptune conjunction in the sixth is interesting. At its best it can indicate someone who works for the benefit of all... an everyday saint. At its worst it can indicate a intinerant, homeless individual who dumpster-dives and lives off the leavings of others. Worse still, it can indicate a balladeer whose conquests are disappointingly limited to the opposite sex rather than himself or his art.

The position of Mars is concerning. It's conjunct the eighth house which traditionally can indicate death by violence, but interestingly it's also perigrine (unaspected) which could mean something completely different. I'll have to examine this at length.

13 Muluc said...

Ah materialist science, so limited. It's like trying to understand a poem by analysing the letters that make up the words.

Burnie Metzen said...

I just came across this and thought that you might be interested. I don't really know what the essence of the matter is but it is sure not in the mainstream of physics(my opinion and only my intuitive take)but I believe in the magical and unexplained as adjuncts to accepted theory. This is a link to a talk by Nassim Haramein.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6151699791256390335#

I have never been able to accept singularity as a start of our universe. Then I thought of it as the backside of a blackhole, and it made more sense. I am not even close to being anything other than another bozo on the bus, ignorant of the complexity of physics. When I saw this video I was captivated because of what I had imagined. I would say I have no idea if this has validity but it certainly made some kind of sense on an intuitive level. Is that because I wanted to believe it? I have no idea. Anyway, it is food for the hungry appetite of those who seek. Thought you might like it.
Burnie

Burnie Metzen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Burnie Metzen said...

As a result of your post I went to another site, Astrodienst, and did a chart. I am posting it on my blog but I am not capable of interpretation. If all things are connected, as I believe, then astrology is a valid tool, as is the Tarot, Runes, I Ching.

To me the universe is magical underneath all the physics and formulas.

psychegram said...

I've come across Haramein's work myself. Interesting stuff to be sure. Is it true? I can't say. His black hole/white hole dynamic take I'm skeptical (but open too) although the scaling correlation is very interesting indeed.

What I found most useful, from a conceptual standpoint, was his dimensional analysis: the notion that, contrary to normally accepted "3 dimensions are real but 0, 1, 2, 4, etc are not" is mistaken, and that in fact it is only the zeroth dimension, the point, that has any reality (the other dimensions arising from it.) This alone is a very powerful idea. From it you can derive ... everything, really.

Lukiftian said...

Alle ist maia, Psikigram. ;-)

"Nothingness with twinkles. Ah! but what twinkles!"

tree said...

裸體裸照裸女愛愛無碼尋夢視訊聊天a漫a片a圖一夜情一葉情人妻激情情色寫真美女自拍辣妹自拍正妹自拍美女走光辣妹走光正妹走光脫衣秀脫衣走光色情自慰自拍成人全裸打炮打手槍打飛機巨乳巨奶女優

珮瑜 said...

自拍走光貼走光自拍自拍性照片台灣性愛自拍影片歐美免費自拍日本妹av女優日本妹圖日本性姿勢日本性感熱辣寫真日本性影片日本真情寫真日本做愛姿勢日本無碼免費影片日本免費a短片日本免費a片線上看日本免費a片線上日本女優觀賞日本片免費試看日本片商日本卡通免費a片日本卡通圖庫日本正妹av女優日本成人片卡通日本成人影城日本色小遊戲日本色情按摩影片日本色情區日本色情漫話日本免費av片日本無碼貼圖金瓶梅成人漫畫金瓶梅情色小說文學成人無碼影片

洪淑芷 said...

great msg for me, thanks a lot dude˙﹏˙

v奎峰奎峰 said...

It's great!!..........................................

AmiHopson瓊仁豪慧 said...

加油!期待更新哦! ........................................

志平 said...

KK777一夜激情聊天live show成人自拍貼圖自慰少婦自拍裸體圖片台灣色情成人網站情人視訊網情色留言板視訊美女免費視訊聊天室限制級極度震撼情色論壇色情特區自拍裸女貼圖潮吹性影片觀賞小穴情色片a圖片sex story性愛影片美女做愛成人色情網站性愛圖片成人情色貼圖全裸寫真集圖片走光圖女生陰毛自慰影片色情av1007成人色情聊天室女生自慰裸體照成人影音聊天台灣色情網站色情片打手槍情色天堂成人視訊聊天免費情色網站av網超性感辣妹激突成人論壇情色視訊聊天鹹濕成人網站av成人論壇免費美女視訊

RexTemples20144 said...

ut聊天77p2p85cc85st85街視訊視訊聊天ava片a片下載成人情色色情影音視訊聊天洪爺影城洪爺免費視訊免費a片免費一對多utsogo論壇ut聊天室成人片免費看................

Anonymous said...

You have spam on your blog, I've been getting it emailed to me.

9 Cib

OliveWol8888 said...

口交18禁貼圖寫真視訊援交露點爆乳潮吹裸體裸照裸女愛愛無碼尋夢視訊聊天a漫a片a圖一夜情一葉情人妻激情情色寫真美女自拍辣妹自拍正妹自拍美女走光辣妹走光正妹走光脫衣秀脫衣走光色情